Presidential Evidence Assistant
An intelligent system that lets users ask questions and compare proposals from more than 24 presidential candidates. It provides answers based on each candidate's government proposals and interviews, linking to the original source of each statement.
Designed for trust
Traceable citations
Every claim carries a [N] reference linking to a YouTube video at the exact second, a PDF at the page number, or the original web page.
No opinions or rankings
The system never ranks candidates or says one proposal is better. It presents what each candidate said and lets the user decide.
Balanced retrieval
Comparisons guarantee fair representation — candidates with more published material don't dominate the results.
Transparent gaps
When information is missing, the system says so explicitly rather than fabricating or filling in gaps.
How it works
We collect proposals, interviews, and media articles related to each candidate. The tool classifies the query, searches across sources, and generates a response with verifiable citations.
- Uneven coverage: only 2 of 24 candidates have structured published proposals.
- Transcription quality: automatic video transcriptions may contain errors.
- Information changes over time: the system reflects what was published at the last data update.
- Variable media coverage: some candidates have 3–4 outlets, others only one.
Interested in a similar system?
Get in touch